The White House is defending a government-funded television ad featuring President Trump as a public service announcement, while Democratic lawmakers demand it be pulled and its costs disclosed before the midterms.
The White House is pushing back against Democratic demands to pull a government-funded television spot featuring President Donald Trump, describing the 30-second ad as a public service announcement that reminds Americans what makes their country worth defending. The spot, which carries the on-screen disclosure "Paid for by the U.S. Government," has aired repeatedly on Fox News and Newsmax in the weeks before the midterm elections. Democratic appropriators say the ad crosses a legal line by using taxpayer money to promote the sitting president.
The administration is not backing down. Officials argue the spot is educational and patriotic, and that the objections say more about the critics than about the message itself.
The ad runs about half a minute and leans into themes familiar to the president's supporters. It flashes images of Trump while on-screen messages read "America will never be a communist country," "Largest tax cuts in history" and "Defend law and order and police." The track "Love Me" by JMSN plays underneath, and the spot closes with a clip of UFC chief executive Dana White calling Trump "the toughest, most resilient person I've ever met."
The initial media buy was modest. AdImpact, a firm that tracks political advertising, estimated the first placement at roughly $14,000. Even so, the symbolism of a government-funded message running ahead of a national election drew immediate attention from Capitol Hill.
Officials say the message is a straightforward appeal to national pride at a time of intense political noise, not a campaign pitch dressed up in government letterhead.
In a release issued Friday, the administration said presidential public service announcements are nothing new and described the spots as educational and patriotic. The ads, officials said, are meant to remind Americans "to love their country and understand what makes it worth defending, at home, at our borders, and abroad."
A White House official said the ads are not political because Trump is not on the ballot and the spots carry no call to action. The administration pointed to past public service efforts, including a COVID-19 vaccination message featuring former presidents during the Biden administration.
"When prior Administrations utilized the airwaves, it was called 'public education.' When this Administration promotes pride in our country, many of those same voices call it 'propaganda,'" the White House said. "Patriotism isn't partisan. These public service announcements are unapologetically American, clearly disclosed, and aimed at the country -- not a line on the ballot."
The fight also fits a broader pattern of the administration moving around traditional press gatekeepers, including its decision to bar CNN, MS NOW and Politico from the White House press pool as it reshapes who gets access to the president.
Sen. Maggie Hassan, D-N.H., has asked White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles for records detailing the cost of producing and airing the spot, where the money came from and the government purpose behind it. Hassan wrote that the advertisement "does not have a clear official government purpose" and could conflict with restrictions on using appropriated funds for propaganda intended to aid a political party or candidates.
Rep. Jamie Raskin, D-Md., raised separate Hatch Act and ethics concerns, writing that the ad may amount to "felony criminal theft and conversion of government property for political campaign purposes." He added that it would be a Hatch Act violation for any government employees who worked on it or used government resources to make it.
Federal appropriations law generally bars agencies from spending public funds on unauthorized publicity or propaganda. Legal experts have noted, however, that the question is distinct from campaign finance law because the spot does not endorse a candidate or expressly urge voters to take action.
The White House has not publicly identified which agency or appropriation paid for the advertisement, and that gap is now the center of the congressional inquiry. Hassan's request for records could force disclosure in the coming days, while appropriators on both sides weigh whether to attach new restrictions to future spending bills.
For now, the administration is treating the ad as a settled matter. Officials say the message is aimed at the country, not at any ballot, and they show no sign of pulling it as the midterms approach. Whether Democrats can turn the spot into a legal or political problem -- or whether it becomes another footnote in a season already defined by hard-edged messaging -- is the question that will play out over the next several weeks.
The White House is defending a government-funded television ad featuring President Trump as a public service announcement, while Democratic lawmakers demand it be pulled and its costs disclosed before the midterms.
freedomlinedispatch.com
