The Supreme Court granted an emergency appeal from Republican campaign committees in a dispute over TV ad rates, clearing the way for parties to access the discounted candidate rate in the final weeks before the midterms.
The Supreme Court on Friday granted an emergency appeal from Republican campaign committees in a dispute over campaign ad prices, clearing a legal roadblock to cheaper television airtime in the final stretch before the November midterms. The unsigned order temporarily set aside a lower court ruling that favored Democratic candidates who argued discounted broadcast rates should be limited to candidates alone. Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson was the lone justice to publicly dissent from the decision.
Federal law requires broadcast stations to offer their lowest available advertising rate in the 60 days preceding a general election. Everyone agrees candidates get the discount. The question before the justices was whether political parties and joint fundraising committees can claim it too.
In March, the Federal Communications Commission's Media Bureau said certain party-coordinated advertisements are entitled to those prices. Four Democrats, including Sen. Jon Ossoff of Georgia and former Sen. Sherrod Brown of Ohio, challenged that finding in court and won before a divided panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit.
The National Republican Congressional Committee and the National Republican Senatorial Committee then asked the Supreme Court to intervene, arguing that broadcasters were already charging them higher rates and upending their planned budgets after the appeals court decision. The justices agreed to halt the lower ruling for now, with the majority concluding that the challengers could not come to the federal judiciary yet because their review petition with the FCC was still pending.
The court also found the party committees would suffer irreparable harm without relief.
"Current and future recissions will require the party committees to pay more for advertising space, thereby hampering their efforts to reach the electorate in the critical weeks leading up to the midterms," the unsigned opinion reads.
Justice Jackson, the court's junior liberal justice, filed a one-paragraph dissent explaining that the lower panel likely had authority to move ahead with the case. The rest of the court appeared to split 8-1 in favor of the Republican committees, though justices are not required to disclose their votes in emergency decisions.
Republicans largely centered their case on the argument that the judges had no authority to get involved, describing the FCC notice as a "staff-level guidance document."
The Trump administration backed the emergency appeal, with Solicitor General D. John Sauer telling the justices that the notice does not grant favored treatment to one side or the other.
"The notice's interpretation offers the same benefit to all sides," Sauer wrote.
National Republican Senatorial Committee Communications Director Joanna Rodriguez celebrated the outcome, calling the Democratic lawsuit "frivolous and partisan."
"The NRSC structured itself and our campaigns to maximize the fall of coordinated spending limits and achieve unprecedented cost-sharing on polling, research, critical infrastructure, advertising, and direct mail," Rodriguez said. "Today's decision ensures those efforts will be even further strengthened as the candidate rate on our coordinated television spending stretches our hard dollars further than ever before."
The ruling builds on a June Supreme Court decision that removed limits on parties spending money in coordination with candidates. That earlier ruling was seen as a boon to Republicans because the national party holds a sizable cash advantage over Democrats, and access to cheaper ad rates could stretch that edge even further.
Democrats, meanwhile, argued the lower courts acted properly and had every right to intervene, insisting that the text of federal law directly supports candidates on both the reviewability question and the merits.
Friday's order is emergency relief, not a final ruling. The underlying dispute remains pending before the FCC, where the Democratic challengers' review petition is still working its way through the agency. The legal fight over who gets the candidate discount could return to the courts after the agency acts.
For now, the practical effect is immediate: Republican party committees can lock in the lower candidate rate on coordinated television buys in the roughly 60-day window before voters head to the polls. With control of Congress on the line in November and the first midterm ballots already in the mail in some states, the ad-rate fight is the latest election-related dispute to land at the high court this cycle.
The Supreme Court granted an emergency appeal from Republican campaign committees in a dispute over TV ad rates, clearing the way for parties to access the discounted candidate rate in the final weeks before the midterms.
freedomlinedispatch.com
